Rajat Khare's Appin Accused of Silencing Global Media

Web DeskNovember 28, 2024 04:24 PMworld
  • RSF condemns Appin's legal tactics against journalists.
  • Fifteen media organizations targeted by Appin's lawsuits.
  • SLAPP suits threaten press freedom and investigative reporting.
Rajat Khare's Appin Accused of Silencing Global MediaImage Credits: dawn
Rajat Khare's Appin faces allegations of silencing media globally, raising concerns over press freedom and legal intimidation tactics.

In recent developments, a cybersecurity firm co-founded by Indian entrepreneur Rajat Khare has come under fire for allegedly silencing media outlets across the globe. Reporters Without Borders (RSF), a prominent organization advocating for press freedom, has raised serious concerns about the tactics employed by Khare and his company, Appin. This situation highlights a growing trend where powerful individuals use legal means to intimidate journalists and stifle investigative reporting.

According to RSF, media outlets from various countries, including the US, Switzerland, France, and India, have received letters demanding retractions of articles that investigate Appin's practices. These letters often threaten legal action, creating a chilling effect on journalism. RSF noted that at least 15 media organizations have been targeted, with five facing actual legal proceedings. The organization condemned these actions, labeling them as "gag lawsuits" aimed at suppressing free speech.

Rajat Khare, who co-founded Appin in 2003, has been accused of offering questionable hacking services, as reported by reputable publications like The New Yorker and Reuters. The RSF investigation revealed that since 2022, numerous articles, newsletters, and podcasts have been altered or removed due to the pressure exerted by Khare and the Association of Appin Training Centres (AOATC), an entity claiming to protect Appin's reputation.

These legal maneuvers, known as strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs), pose a significant threat to journalism. A source familiar with the situation expressed concern that if powerful individuals can successfully use the Indian legal system to silence criticism globally, it could set a dangerous precedent. This could lead to widespread self-censorship among journalists, who may fear repercussions for their reporting.

One of the most notable victims of Khare's legal tactics is Reuters, which faced a lengthy legal battle over an investigation titled "How an Indian start-up hacked the world." After ten months, a New Delhi district court reversed a prior decision that had ordered the news agency to take down the article. The investigation revealed that Appin had evolved from a start-up to a significant player in the hacking-for-hire industry, allegedly stealing sensitive information from various high-profile individuals.

Similarly, The New Yorker faced a libel suit from the AOATC over its investigation into India's hacking-for-hire sector, which included references to Appin. Despite the legal threats, The New Yorker stood firm, asserting its commitment to publishing important stories without fear of reprisal.

As the situation unfolds, it is crucial for media outlets to remain vigilant and not succumb to intimidation. The effectiveness of these SLAPP suits can lead to self-censorship, which ultimately undermines the core principles of journalism. RSF has called on courts to handle these lawsuits with wisdom and urged media organizations to resist the pressure that threatens investigative reporting.

The actions of Rajat Khare and Appin serve as a stark reminder of the challenges faced by journalists in today's world. The ability to report freely and without fear of legal repercussions is essential for a healthy democracy. As the landscape of media continues to evolve, it is imperative that both journalists and the public advocate for press freedom and hold those in power accountable for their actions.

Related Post