Justice Shahid Karim Recuses from Election Tribunal Case

Web DeskJune 5, 2024 02:50 PMnational
  • Justice Shahid Karim steps down due to prior involvement in similar case
  • Presidential Ordinance allows appointment of retired judges as election tribunals
  • Importance of judicial independence and integrity highlighted by judge's decision
Justice Shahid Karim Recuses from Election Tribunal CaseImage Credits: brecorder
Justice Shahid Karim of Lahore High Court recuses from a case involving Presidential Ordinance on retired judges as election tribunals, emphasizing judicial integrity and fairness.

Justice Shahid Karim of the Lahore High Court has decided to step down from a case involving a Presidential Ordinance that allows the appointment of retired judges as election tribunals. This decision came as a result of the judge's prior involvement in a similar matter concerning the appointment of election tribunals.

The issue at hand revolves around a Presidential Ordinance that permits the appointment of retired judges to serve as election tribunals. These tribunals play a crucial role in overseeing electoral processes and ensuring fairness and transparency in elections.

Justice Shahid Karim's recusal from the case demonstrates his commitment to upholding the principles of impartiality and avoiding any potential conflicts of interest. By stepping aside and requesting the petition to be reassigned to a different bench, the judge has shown a dedication to ensuring a fair and unbiased legal process.

It is important to note that the appointment of election tribunals is a significant aspect of the electoral system, as these tribunals are responsible for adjudicating disputes related to elections and upholding the integrity of the electoral process.

Justice Shahid Karim's decision to recuse himself from the petition regarding the appointment of retired judges as election tribunals underscores the importance of judicial independence and integrity. By prioritizing fairness and impartiality, the judge has set a commendable example for upholding the rule of law and ensuring transparency in legal proceedings.

Related Post