Saturday, November 16, 2024 05:33 PM
The 26th amendment in Pakistan's constitutional package gains attention as the government seeks consensus for judicial reforms.
In recent weeks, the constitutional package in Pakistan has resurfaced as a focal point of discussion among the ruling parties. Initially set aside, this package is now being prioritized as the government seeks to finalize a consensus draft for presentation in the parliament. The ruling party, with the backing of its allies, is gearing up to introduce the 26th amendment in both the National Assembly and the Senate following the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit.
Legal experts and constitutional advisors within the ruling coalition are reportedly close to reaching an agreement, particularly among allied partners, regarding the contentious package. This consensus is expected to be achieved by the end of the current month, as indicated by discussions with senior members and parliamentary experts. To facilitate further discussions, a special parliamentary committee, led by senior Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) leader Syed Khursheed Shah, is scheduled to convene an important meeting today. All parliamentary parties will be invited to contribute their insights on the 26th constitutional amendment.
In its initial attempt, the government struggled to gather the necessary votes to pass the constitutional package, primarily due to the opposition from Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (F) chief, who withheld his party's 13 votes (8 from the National Assembly and 5 from the Senate). Now, the government is making a second attempt to push the amendment through parliament, this time with a strategic focus on securing the required majority.
The 26th amendment, often referred to as the judicial package, primarily addresses issues related to the judiciary. Among the proposed changes, which are still under discussion, is the introduction of a constitutional court, a move that has faced significant criticism in recent weeks. This proposal aims to establish a parallel federal Constitutional Court alongside the existing Supreme Court.
Another contentious aspect of the draft is the proposal to raise the retirement age for judges from 65 to 68 years. Additionally, there is a suggestion to grant parliament the autonomy to exercise its voting rights as it sees fit, which may also be included in the draft to facilitate its passage. Furthermore, the draft includes provisions that would empower the Prime Minister to appoint the Chief Justice of both the constitutional court and the Supreme Court, along with other clauses addressing pending cases, the appointment of the Chief Election Commissioner, and restrictions on dual nationals serving as judges in the apex court.
As the government prepares for another round of negotiations post-SCO summit, the support of the JUI-F remains crucial for the successful passage of the amendment in parliament. The ongoing discussions and proposed changes highlight the complexities of Pakistan's political landscape and the challenges faced in achieving consensus on significant constitutional reforms.
The revival of the constitutional package underscores the dynamic nature of Pakistan's political environment. As the ruling parties strive to navigate the intricacies of coalition politics and judicial reforms, the outcome of these discussions will have lasting implications for the country's governance and legal framework. It is essential for citizens to stay informed and engaged with these developments, as they directly impact the rule of law and the functioning of democracy in Pakistan.