USA's Realpolitik Approach in Foreign Policy Decisions

The United States of America has a complex history of balancing its proclaimed values with strategic interests in its foreign policy decisions. While the USA has been a vocal advocate for human rights, environmental conservation, and democratic principles on the global stage, its actions have sometimes contradicted these values in pursuit of realpolitik objectives.

Throughout history, the USA has supported regimes and engaged in military interventions that prioritized strategic interests over moral considerations. From supporting dictators during the Cold War to covertly funding rebel groups in Nicaragua, the US has made controversial choices that deviated from its professed values.

One of the most contentious issues where the USA's realpolitik approach is evident is in its unwavering support for Israel despite criticisms of human rights violations and disregard for international law. The US has historically backed Israel, even vetoing resolutions against it and avoiding labeling Israeli settlements as illegal.

In the ongoing Israel-Palestine conflict, the USA's stance has leaned towards Israel, showcasing the influence of realpolitik in shaping its foreign policy decisions. Despite calls for a two-state solution and concerns over settlements hindering peace, the US continues to support Israel, highlighting the complexities of balancing values and strategic interests in international relations.