Matthew Wade reprimanded by ICC for on-field dissent

Web DeskJune 11, 2024 05:08 AMsports
  • Wade received a reprimand for arguing with the umpire
  • He violated ICC Code of Conduct Article 2.8
  • Despite the incident, Wade played a crucial role in Australia's victory
Matthew Wade reprimanded by ICC for on-field dissentImage Credits: arynews
Australia's Matthew Wade faced ICC reprimand for dissent towards umpire during a match against England. Despite the incident, Wade's batting contribution led Australia to victory.

Australia's wicketkeeper-batsman Matthew Wade found himself in hot water during the recent match against England, as he received an official reprimand from the International Cricket Council (ICC) for a heated argument with the on-field umpire. The incident took place in the 18th over of Australia's innings when Wade expressed dissent over an umpiring decision related to a delivery from Adil Rashid.

Wade's actions were considered a Level 1 breach of the ICC Code of Conduct, specifically violating Article 2.8 which addresses showing dissent at an umpire's decision in an international match. Consequently, Wade received one demerit point, marking his first offence within a 24-month period.

The charge against Wade was raised by on-field umpires Nitin Menon and Joel Wilson, with support from third umpire Asif Yaqoob and fourth umpire Jayaraman Madangopal. Wade acknowledged his mistake and agreed to the sanction proposed by match referee Andy Pycroft without the need for a formal hearing.

Despite the incident, Wade showcased his batting prowess by remaining unbeaten on 17 off 10 deliveries, contributing significantly as Australia posted a total of 201-7. In contrast, England fell short in their chase, finishing at 165/6 in their allotted 20 overs.

While Matthew Wade faced disciplinary action for his on-field behavior, his performance with the bat was commendable, helping Australia secure a convincing victory over England. This incident serves as a reminder of the importance of respecting umpires' decisions in the spirit of fair play and sportsmanship.

Related Post