Pakistan rejects US human rights report, calls for objectivity

Web DeskApril 26, 2024 02:30 PMnational
  • Pakistan criticizes US report as unfair and politically biased
  • Emphasizes lack of objectivity in assessment of human rights
  • Calls for addressing urgent human rights violations in Gaza and Kashmir
Pakistan rejects US human rights report, calls for objectivityImage Credits: WE News -
Pakistan firmly dismisses the US State Department's 2023 human rights report as unfair and politically biased, emphasizing the need for objectivity in assessing human rights practices globally. The rejection highlights ongoing tensions between the two countries on international human rights issues.

Pakistan has firmly dismissed the 2023 Country Report on human rights practices released by the US State Department, labeling it as unfair and based on inaccurate information. The report highlighted issues such as arbitrary killings, extrajudicial killings, enforced disappearances, and cases of cruel treatment in Pakistan last year. The Pakistani Foreign Office criticized the report, stating that it lacks objectivity and is politically biased in its assessment of human rights in other countries.

The Foreign Office emphasized that the US State Department's report fails to address urgent human rights violations in regions like Gaza and Indian Occupied Jammu & Kashmir. Pakistan expressed concern over the report's silence on the ongoing genocide in Gaza and urged the US to demonstrate objectivity and impartiality in its assessments.

Despite the criticism, Pakistan reiterated its commitment to strengthening its human rights framework and engaging constructively in promoting the international human rights agenda. The Foreign Office called on the US to exercise due diligence and moral courage in addressing complex human rights issues and supporting efforts to end atrocities in regions facing severe violations.

In conclusion, Pakistan's rejection of the US State Department's human rights report underscores the ongoing tensions between the two countries regarding the assessment of human rights practices. The differing perspectives highlight the challenges in achieving consensus on human rights issues at the international level.

Related Post