PTI members acquitted in rally case due to lack of evidence

Web DeskJuly 1, 2024 03:14 PMnational
  • Magistrate Salman Nadir acquitted 140 PTI members in rally case
  • No incriminating evidence found against accused individuals
  • Court emphasizes importance of evidence in legal proceedings
PTI members acquitted in rally case due to lack of evidenceImage Credits: tribune_pk
Approximately 140 PTI members acquitted in a rally case due to lack of evidence. Judicial Magistrate Salman Nadir absolved all accused individuals. The court emphasized the importance of evidence in legal proceedings and the protection of individuals' rights to peaceful assembly.

Approximately 140 members of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) have been acquitted of charges in a case related to organizing a rally before the general elections. The verdict was delivered by Judicial Magistrate Salman Nadir, who absolved all the accused individuals in a two-page written decision. The case involved PTI leader Irfan Saleem, along with other prominent figures and 130 unidentified persons.

The incident occurred on January 1, 2024, when PTI workers held a rally on Ring Road, leading to a legal complaint from the local police station's SHO. However, the court found that the accused were not arrested at the rally, and no incriminating evidence was discovered in their possession. Furthermore, there were no complaints of road blockages from residents in the area.

Official records confirmed that there was no damage or violence during the protest, highlighting the peaceful nature of the demonstration and the participants' exercise of their constitutional rights. Magistrate Salman's decision was based on the lack of substantial evidence against the defendants. The court emphasized the significance of peaceful protests as a constitutional right and concluded that without concrete proof of wrongdoing, the charges could not be upheld.

The ruling in favor of the PTI members underscores the importance of evidence in legal proceedings and the protection of individuals' rights to peaceful assembly. This case serves as a reminder of the need for thorough investigation before levying charges against individuals participating in public demonstrations.

Related Post