Supreme Court Reserves Order on Patanjali Misleading Ads Case

The Supreme Court of India has recently reserved its order on a contempt plea against Baba Ramdev, Acharya Balkrishna, and others in the Patanjali misleading advertisements case. This case revolves around the promotion of products with suspended licenses and affected medicines by Patanjali. The apex court has exempted Ramdev and Balkrishna from personal appearance at the next hearing, granting Patanjali time to file affidavits detailing the steps taken to rectify the situation.

During the recent hearing, Justices Hima Kohli and Ahsanuddin Amanullah stressed the significance of consumers making well-informed choices. The court called upon Baba Ramdev to utilize his influence responsibly. Patanjali is expected to submit an affidavit within three weeks outlining the measures taken to remove misleading ads and recall the affected products.

In a previous session, the Supreme Court underscored the accountability of celebrities and social media influencers for the products they endorse. If endorsed products are found to be deceptive, these individuals could face legal consequences. Additionally, the court criticized the president of the Indian Medical Association for making inappropriate remarks about the apex court in an interview with a news agency.

The ongoing case involving Patanjali's misleading advertisements highlights the importance of transparency and accountability in advertising practices. Consumers are encouraged to be vigilant and make informed decisions when purchasing products. The Supreme Court's scrutiny of endorsements by public figures serves as a reminder of the responsibility that comes with influence. As the case progresses, it remains crucial for companies and individuals to uphold ethical standards in their promotional activities.