Justice Athar Minallah advocates for court transparency

Recently, Justice Athar Minallah of the Supreme Court delivered a dissenting opinion in a case involving the live streaming of proceedings related to amendments in NAB laws. The case raised significant questions about transparency and public access to court proceedings.

The issue at hand revolved around the debate on whether court proceedings, especially those of public interest, should be live-streamed to ensure transparency and accountability. Justice Minallah's dissenting opinion highlighted the fundamental right of citizens to access court proceedings, emphasizing the importance of open justice in a democratic society.

Justice Minallah's stance underscored the need for increased transparency in legal proceedings, particularly when it comes to matters that impact the public interest. By advocating for the live streaming of court proceedings, he aimed to promote greater accountability and trust in the judicial system.

Justice Athar Minallah's dissenting opinion serves as a reminder of the crucial role of transparency in upholding the principles of justice. By championing the right to access court proceedings, he has contributed to the ongoing discourse on accountability and openness in the legal system. Moving forward, his stance may influence future decisions regarding the live streaming of court proceedings, ultimately shaping the way justice is delivered and perceived in the country.