JUI-F legal battle over impersonation scandal

A dispute within the Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam (JUI-F) has escalated into a legal battle, reaching the Supreme Court of Pakistan. The controversy revolves around Sadaf Ihsan, who allegedly impersonated another candidate to secure a seat in the National Assembly. The Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) reinstated Sadaf Ihsan despite objections from the JUI-F, claiming she stole the identity of the party's original candidate.

The JUI-F had submitted a list of candidates for reserved seats, including Hina Bibi, but omitted details for Sadaf Yasmin, the candidate allegedly impersonated by Sadaf Ihsan. The ECP issued conflicting notifications, leading to a series of appeals and inquiries. The JUI-F argued that political parties have the sole authority to nominate candidates for reserved seats, emphasizing the ECP's responsibility to prevent impersonation.

The case highlights the importance of upholding electoral integrity and the need for stringent verification processes to prevent fraudulent practices. The outcome of this legal battle will not only impact the involved parties but also set a precedent for future electoral disputes in Pakistan.