PML-N Leaders Clash Over Election Rigging Allegations

Tensions within the ruling Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) have escalated as two senior party leaders, former federal ministers, engaged in a public dispute over allegations of election rigging. The rift between Rana Sanaullah and Javed Latif has brought internal party conflicts to the forefront.

Rana Sanaullah criticized Javed Latif, labeling him a 'conspiracy theorist' for his claims of widespread election rigging. In response, Latif challenged Sanaullah to step down as party president Punjab if the elections were indeed fair, holding him accountable for the party's performance in the province.

Despite attempts by the PML-N to downplay the accusations and avoid public scrutiny, the allegations of election rigging and collusion with influential entities have gained momentum, causing a rift among party leaders.

Javed Latif was the first to raise concerns about interference in the elections, alleging manipulation by party members like Rana Tanveer. An inquiry has been initiated to investigate these claims, indicating a growing unease within the party.

Rana Sanaullah, who previously attributed government formation to external influences, dismissed Latif's allegations as conspiracy theories. This led to a heated exchange between the two leaders, with Latif challenging Sanaullah to take responsibility for the party's performance in Faisalabad and resign if he believed in the fairness of the results.

The internal discord within the PML-N underscores deep-rooted issues regarding transparency and accountability in the political landscape, raising questions about the party's integrity and leadership.

The public spat between Rana Sanaullah and Javed Latif highlights the growing tensions within the PML-N over allegations of election rigging. As the party grapples with internal conflicts and accusations of collusion, the credibility of its leadership and commitment to democratic principles come under scrutiny.