IHC Judges Accuse Premier Spy Agency of Interference

Recently, the Islamabad High Court (IHC) judges have raised concerns over the alleged interference of the state in judicial matters. This issue is not new, as other provincial high courts and the IHC have previously held meetings to address similar concerns.

On March 25, six out of the eight IHC judges brought forward serious allegations against the country's premier spy agency. They accused the agency of using coercive tactics to influence members of the higher and district judiciary. This revelation has sparked a heated debate within the legal community and raised questions about the independence of the judiciary.

The judges' claims shed light on the challenges faced by the judiciary in maintaining its autonomy and upholding the rule of law. The allegations have also put a spotlight on the need for greater transparency and accountability in the country's judicial system.

In response to these allegations, there is a growing call for a thorough investigation into the matter to ensure that the judiciary remains free from external pressures. The outcome of this investigation could have far-reaching implications for the future of the legal system in the country.