Pemra's Notification Challenged in High Courts

Web DeskMay 23, 2024 05:08 PMnational
  • Petitions challenge Pemra's restrictions on court case reporting
  • Debate on media freedom vs. legal constraints intensifies
  • Stakeholders urged to find balanced approach for media regulation
Pemra's Notification Challenged in High CourtsImage Credits: dawn.com
Three petitions filed in Lahore and Islamabad high courts challenge Pemra's recent notification imposing restrictions on reporting court cases. Debate on media freedom and legal constraints intensifies as stakeholders seek a balanced approach for media regulation in Pakistan.

On Thursday, three separate petitions were submitted to the Lahore and Islamabad high courts challenging a recent notification issued by the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Pemra). The notification, which was released earlier this week, imposed restrictions on the reporting and broadcasting of content related to ongoing legal cases.

The directive from the electronic media regulator specifically instructed television channels to refrain from airing tickers or headlines related to court proceedings. Instead, they were directed to focus solely on reporting the written orders issued by the court.

These petitions have raised concerns about the implications of such restrictions on the media's ability to provide timely and accurate information to the public. Critics argue that limiting coverage of sub-judice matters could hinder transparency and access to justice.

The debate surrounding Pemra's notification underscores the delicate balance between media freedom and legal constraints. While the authority aims to prevent sensationalism and biased reporting, critics fear that excessive restrictions could undermine the media's role as a watchdog and limit public discourse.

As the legal battle over Pemra's notification unfolds in the high courts, the outcome will have far-reaching implications for media regulation in Pakistan. It is essential for stakeholders to engage in constructive dialogue to ensure a balanced approach that upholds both press freedom and legal integrity.

Related Post