Thursday, July 4, 2024 06:38 PM
The District and Sessions Court of Islamabad witnesses a dramatic exchange during PTI founder Imran Khan's appeal hearing on an illegal marriage case, highlighting the complexities of legal proceedings and the judiciary's commitment to justice.
The District and Sessions Court of Islamabad witnessed a heated exchange during the appeals hearing of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder Imran Khan and his wife Bushra Bibi against the sentence in an illegal marriage case. The complainant, Khawar Manika, expressed distrust in Sessions Judge Shahrukh Arjumand, alleging bias and seeking a transfer of the case.
During the courtroom drama, Khawar Manika accused the judge of favoring PTI and raised concerns about receiving justice. PTI lawyer Salman Akram Raja vehemently defended the judge and criticized Manika's tactics as an attempt to pressure the court.
Judge Shah Rukh Arjamand, undeterred by the accusations, emphasized the importance of fair proceedings and refused to transfer the case. The exchange between the parties escalated, with allegations of lies and manipulation flying back and forth.
As the hearing progressed, the court deliberated on the legal aspects of the case, with references to relevant sections and procedures. Despite the intense verbal sparring, the court maintained its focus on the appeal process and reserved judgment on Manika's motion for a transfer.
The courtroom drama surrounding the illegal marriage case highlights the complexities and tensions involved in legal proceedings. While both parties passionately advocate for their positions, the judiciary remains steadfast in upholding the principles of justice and due process.